Tag Archives: Futurism

The Quiet Flame

A short story in three parts

Part One: Serin

On the planet Orilen, there were no fossil fuels.

Not because the Orileni were wise; they simply had no choice. Their world, with its warm sapphire seas and forests of silver-needled trees, had never entombed the dead for long. Microbial life broke down the past too quickly; pressure was never right; time never still. So no coal. No oil. No gas.

For millennia, fire was a whisper. The Orileni learned to shape metal with solar furnaces made of polished obsidian and liquid lenses. Their first machines were spun by water and air, stored in stone chambers pressurised like lungs. Homes were heated not by combustion but by deep pipes sunk into the planet’s breath: geothermal warmth, constant and quiet.

Children grew up knowing the sun’s arc as intimately as their own heartbeat. Energy was not something hoarded or burned: it was something borrowed for a time.

The ‘Great Shift’ began not with an explosion, but a question.

Continue reading

ESPELETIA: The Complete Framework

In previous posts, we’ve introduced the ESPELETIA dimensions (Ethics, Society, Politics, Environment, Legislation, Economy, Technology, International and Arts) and the ‘key drivers’ (AI, IoT, Big Data, Robotics, Communications and the ‘X Factor’). We now build this into a complete futurology tool for projecting into the future, and provide a complete set of documentation for research and/or classroom exercises.

Continue reading

The Futurology Grid

The previous post introduced the ESPELETIA futurism tool. Here this is combined with key emergent and future technology drivers to deliver The Futurology Grid, a useful framework for practical futurism.

The nine dimensions of the ESPELETIA tool are the coloured column headings in the table below.

The details of each are as follows:

Continue reading

A New Futurism Tool: ESPELETIA

Over the decades, we’ve seen PEST extended to PESTLE to STEEPLED, but have we now got all the angles covered for practical 21st century futurism? Perhaps not.

We’ve used the STEEPLED model before several times on this site, with some success. It’s undoubtedly a useful tool. But it’s not perfect: it’s time to recognise its limitations and introduce something new.

Continue reading