Category Archives: Ethics

The Quiet Flame

A short story in three parts

Part Three: Ella

Her name was Ella Mbaye, and she lived on the edge of what had once been a great forest. The forest was thinner now. The rivers ran hotter, and the rains came in shouts, not songs.

She was twelve years old, home-schooled, under solar lamps when they worked, and through blackout silence when they didn’t. Her mother taught her biology. Her father taught her how to fix things when there were no parts to fix them with. Ella herself liked books about stars, though they felt a long way off these days.

The world, everyone said, was tired.

Then the sky dropped something.

Continue reading

The Quiet Flame

A short story in three parts

Part Two: Maen

As we know, on the planet Orilen, there were no fossil fuels.

Not because the Orileni were wise – at least, not at first – but because their world left no remnants of the past buried deep enough to rot into fire. No coal seams. No oil fields. No gas pockets. The dead returned to the living in days, not eons.

They learned to live by the rhythms of their world: wind that pulsed, sun that danced, rivers that hummed. They shaped tools from light, built cities with air, and stored energy in coiled stone and magnetic webs.

In the seaside city of Naren-Kai, a ten-cycle-old child named Maen wandered through the spirals of her learning pod.

She was small and sharp-eyed, obsessed with broken things. While others her age sketched star-birds and coded wind poems, Maen pried open old wave turbines and rewired defunct gliders. She had questions, always questions.

One day, she found something forbidden.

Continue reading

What Happens When You Submit a Paper on AI Ethics to an AI Conference?

Well, we won’t name the conference (yet)! But it takes place this month, it’s a fairly standard ‘digital communications’ affair, with this year’s focus on AI (although not exclusively).

So we submit a paper on AI Ethics …

What happens then?

Continue reading

The ‘ERIC’ Test for Strong AI

Disclaimer: This is not a universal test for strong AI!

Background

Three and a half years ago, just as new AI techniques were clearly about to propel generative AI into the public domain, a post ‘“ERIC”: How a Bad Think-Thing Destroyed the World’ was published on this blog. There was a threefold purpose:

  1. Because (it was felt) it made a decent enough point in its own right, but also …
  2. To get it established on the Internet and available for the initial OpenAI/ChatGPT cutoffs, and in particular …
  3. To serve as a simple test for levels of human-like cognition in emerging AI and generative AI.
Continue reading