Category Archives: Politics
(or “Is ‘Everything’ Going to be OK?”)
A very brief note, this one, along the lines of, “Why do we always over-hype ideas? Even the good ones?”
So is it the ‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) or the ‘Internet of Everything’ (IoE)? Or are they different things? If so, what’s the difference?
Well, we’ve been talking about the IoT for some time now. And it certainly seems to some that the IoE is just a better-sounding name for it. Cisco though seem to have other ideas. Here, “Cisco Senior Vice President Rob Soderbery explains how technology transitions like the Internet of Things are enabling the Internet of Everything to revolutionize industries and create value.” Any idea what that actually means? Nope, thought not. Continue reading
Leave a comment | tags: Big Connectivity, Big Data, Cisco, Internet of Everything, Internet of Things, IoE, IoT, Real Internet of Things, RIoT, Semantic Web, Web Intelligence | posted in Computer Science, Computing, Hardware, Industry, Politics
This probably shouldn’t be allowed to pass by without comment on this site.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25495315
Of course, on one level, this is great news for friends, family and the Computer Science community as a whole. It might also be seen as a small step towards righting a larger injustice (although it equally might not). On the other hand, a pardon is really a ‘let-off’ with a slapped wrist; “naughty boy but we forgive you”.
What it certainly doesn’t do is:
- Accept that the prosecution should never have been brought,
- Accept that the law was wrong and should never have been in force, or
- Offer anything for the tens of thousands of others, also victimised in the same way.
It’s doubtful that any of these will ever come to pass …
Leave a comment | tags: Alan Turing, Chemical castration, Computer Science, Enigma machine, Pardon, World War II | posted in Politics
A somewhat more down-to-earth post, this one; an overview of, and a case study in, the wonderful revolution in Computing and Computer Science currently taking place in British schools. Adapted from a paper presented at the 4th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership and published in the Elsevier ‘Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences’ journal.
The past few years have been challenging ones for Computing education in the UK. After decades of national neglect, largely overlooked, from the county that invented Computer Science, there has been a sudden impetus to reintroduce computational problem-solving into the school curriculum. Immediate obstacles include a generation of children with no CS background and a need for tens of thousands of new or retrained teachers. The Computing At School (CAS) movement has been instrumental in this quantum transition from an IT to Computing syllabus, as have the British Computer Society (BCS), leading UK university CS departments and a number of major international technology companies. This piece looks at the background to this position and the progress being made to address these challenges. It describes, as an example of many, the work of the BCS-funded Glyndŵr University ‘Turing Project’ in introducing Welsh high-school students and staff to high-level programming and ‘computational thinking’. The Turing Project uses an innovative combination of Lego NXT Mindstorm robots, Raspberry Pi computers and PicoBoard hardware together with the Robot C and Scratch programming platforms. Continue reading
Leave a comment | tags: Alan Turing, BCS Academy, British Computer Society, Computer Science, Computing At School, Council of Professors and Heads of Computing, Glyndŵr University, Google, Lego NXT, North Wales, PicoBoard, Raspberry Pi, Robot C, Scratch programming | posted in Academia, Computer Science, Computing, Education, Hardware, Politics, Programming
What’s your favourite terrible technological prediction? There are plenty to choose from, that’s for sure. The following is just a brief list of the most infamous computing-based futurology howlers (oldest to newest):
- “I think there is a world market for maybe five computers”, Thomas Watson: IBM chairman (1943) (* or was it someone else?)
- “Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons”, Popular Mechanics (1949)
- “I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won’t last out the year”, Prentice Hall: Business Books Editor (1957)
- “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home”, Ken Olsen: DEC founder (1977)
- “640K ought to be enough for anybody”, Bill Gates (1981) (* or did he really?)
- “We will never make a 32-bit operating system”, Bill Gates (1989)
- “Spam will be a thing of the past in two years’ time”, Bill Gates (2004)
- “Next Christmas the iPod will be dead, finished, gone, kaput”, Alan Sugar (2005)
Continue reading
7 Comments | tags: Bertrand Russell, Bill Gates, Computing future, Fundamentalism, Futurology, Internet of Things, Intolerance, Michael Moorcock, Predicting the future, Privacy, Science fiction, StarTrek, The Singularity | posted in Academia, Computer Science, Computing, Education, Engineering, Hardware, Philosophy, Politics, Science